Compensationless Khul and Post-Consummation Mut a: A Comparative Doctrinal Analysis
Main Article Content
Abdul Jalil Shahidzai
Habibur Rahman Habibi
Islamic jurisprudence distinguishes wife-initiated dissolution (khul?) from husband-initiated repudiation (?al?q), yet the juridical status of compensationless khul? and the conditional obligation of post-consummation mut?a remain undertheorized in comparative scholarship. This study examines the doctrinal rulings of the four Sunni schools on these two questions. Employing a qualitative doctrinal design, the research critically analyzes authoritative classical manuals across the ?anaf?, M?lik?, Sh?fi??, and ?anbal? traditions through comparative fiqh and u??l? frameworks. The findings reveal that compensationless khul? is uniformly classified as a metaphorical formula (kin?ya) requiring juridical intention (niyya), with divergent revocability outcomes: irrevocable (b??in) in the ?anaf? and dominant M?lik? and Sh?fi?? views, yet revocable (raj??) in the authoritative ?anbal? position. Regarding mut?a, only the Sh?fi?? school mandates it as obligatory for post-consummation divorcees, whereas the ?anaf? and ?anbal? schools restrict obligatoriness to pre-consummation scenarios with unrealized dower, and the M?lik? school treats it as uniformly recommended. These findings demonstrate that classical divergence stems from differential calibration of linguistic formalism and substitutive-obligation logic, carrying direct implications for contemporary Islamic family law codification.
Abu Dawud, S. A. (2008). Sunan Abi Dawud (A. M. D. ?Aww?d, Ed.). Beirut: D?r al-Sal?m.
Al-Abhar?, A. B. M. ?A. (2021). Shar? al-Mukhta?ar al-Kab?r (A. ?A. ?asan, Ed., Vol. 1). Dubai: Jam?iyyat D?r al-Birr.
Al-An??r?, Z. D. Z. M. (2024). Fat? al-Wahh?b bi-Shar? Minh?j al-??lib?n (M. b. ?. b. S. Say?, Ed., Vol. 1). Kuwait: D?r al-?iy??.
Al-Haytam?, S. A. A. I. ?. (2020). Tu?fat al-Mu?t?j bi-Shar? al-Minh?j (A. b. A. B. al-Shaykh? al-D?ghist?n?, Ed., Vol. 7). Kuwait: D?r al-?iy??.
Al-K?s?n?, ?A. D. A. B. M. (2003). Bad??i? al-?an??i? f? Tart?b al-Shar??i? (?A. Mu?awwad & ??. ?Abd al-Mawj?d, Eds., Vol. 4). Beirut: D?r al-Kutub al-?Ilmiyya.
Al-Kharsh?, A. A. M. (1899). Shar? al-Kharsh? ?al? Mukhta?ar Khal?l (Vol. 4). Bul?q: al-Ma?ba?a al-Kubr? al-Am?riyya.
Al-Maqdis?, B. A. ?A. R. I. (2001). al-?Udda f? Shar? al-?Umda (A. b. ?Al?, Ed.). Cairo: D?r al-?ad?th.
Al-Maqdis?, M. ?A. A. M. I. Q. (2000). al-Muqni? f? Fiqh al-Im?m A?mad ibn ?anbal (M. al-Arn???? & Y. M. al-Kha??b, Eds.). Jeddah: Maktabat al-Saw?d?.
Al-Mard?w?, ?A. D. A. H. ?A. (1956). al-In??f f? Ma?rifat al-R?ji? min al-Khil?f (Vol. 8). Beirut: D?r I?y?? al-Tur?th al-?Arab?.
Al-Nawaw?, M. A. Z. (2005). Minh?j al-??lib?n wa-?Umdat al-Muft?n. Beirut: D?r al-Minh?j.
Al-Samarqand?, ?A. D. (1984). Tu?fat al-Fuqah?? (2nd ed., Vol. 2). Beirut: D?r al-Kutub al-?Ilmiyya.
Al-Shayb?n?, M. b. al-?. (2012). al-A?l (M. H. K. ?Abd al-Maj?d, Ed.). Beirut: D?r Ibn ?azm.
Al-Zarkash?, S. D. M. (1993). Shar? al-Zarkash? ?al? Mukhta?ar al-Kharq? (Vol. 5). Riyadh: Maktabat al-?Ubayk?n.
Al-Zurq?n?, ?A. B. Y. A. (2002). Shar? al-Zurq?n? ?al? Mukhta?ar Khal?l (?A. S. M. Am?n, Ed., Vol. 4). Beirut: D?r al-Kutub al-?Ilmiyya.
Ali, S. A. (2016). Gender and human rights in Islam and international law: Equal before Allah, unequal before man? Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 15(1), 87-128.
An-Na'im, A. A. (2010). Islam and the secular state: Negotiating the future of Shar??a. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Esposito, J. L., & DeLong-Bas, N. J. (2018). Women in Muslim family law (2nd ed.). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Fadel, M. (1997). Two women, one man: Knowledge, power, and gender in medieval Sunni legal thought. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 29(2), 185-204.
Hallaq, W. B. (2009). Shar??a: Theory, practice, transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ibn al-Najj?r, M. b. A. b. ?A. al-?. (2008). Muntah? al-Ir?d?t: Ma??nat ?l? al-Nuh? li-Shar? al-Muntah? (?A. al-Malik b. ?A. Duhaysh, Ed., Vol. 9). Mecca: Maktabat al-Asad?.
Ibn Qud?ma al-Maqdis?, M. ?A. A. A. (1997). al-Mughn? li-Ibn Qud?ma (Vol. 10). Saudi Arabia: D?r ??lam al-Kutub.
Ibn Qud?ma al-Maqdis?, M. ?A. A. A. (1997). al-K?f? f? Fiqh al-Im?m A?mad (Vol. 4). Beirut: D?r al-Kutub al-?Ilmiyya.
Ibn Rushd al-Fiqh?, A. W. M. b. A. (1995). Bid?yat al-Mujtahid wa-Nih?yat al-Muqta?id (Vol. 3). Jeddah: Maktabat al-?Ilm.
Ibn Rushd al-Qur?ub?, A. W. M. b. A. (1988). al-Muqaddim?t al-Mumahhad?t (M. ?ajj?, Ed., Vol. 1). Beirut: D?r al-Gharb al-Isl?m?.
Kamali, M. H. (2006). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.
Mir-Hosseini, Z. (1999). Islam and gender: The religious debate in contemporary Iran. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nasir, J. J. (2009). The status of women under Islamic law and modern Islamic legislation (3rd ed.). Leiden: Brill.
Nyazee, I. A. K. (Trans.). (2000). The distinguished jurist's primer: Bid?yat al-Mujtahid wa Nih?yat al-Muqta?id (Vols. 1–2). Reading: Garnet Publishing.
Powers, D. S. (1993). The Islamic inheritance system: A socio-historical approach. Arab Law Quarterly, 8(1), 3-29.
Rapoport, Y. (2005). Marriage, money and divorce in medieval Islamic society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sonbol, A. E. A. (2003). Women of Jordan: Islam, labor, and the law. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Tucker, J. E. (2008). Women, family, and gender in Islamic law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Welchman, L. (2000). Beyond the code: Muslim family law and the Shar??a judiciary in the Palestinian West Bank. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Abdul Jalil Shahidzai , Faculty of Sharia Department of Fiqh and Law, Sheikh Zayed University, Khost, Afghanistan
THE LEGAL STATUS OF COMPENSATIONLESS KHUL? AND THE OBLIGATION OF POST-CONSUMMATION MUT?A: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ACROSS THE FOUR SUNNI SCHOOLS OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE.
Abdul Jalil Shahidzai & Habibur Rahman Habibi
Faculty of Sharia, Department of Fiqh and Law, Sheikh Zayed University, Khost, Afghanistan
Email: [email protected]
Faculty of Sharia, Department of Fiqh and Law, Sheikh Zayed University, Khost, Afghanistan Email: [email protected]
Corresponding Author: [email protected]
Habibur Rahman Habibi , Faculty of Sharia, Department of Fiqh and Law, Sheikh Zayed University, Khost, Afghanistan
THE LEGAL STATUS OF COMPENSATIONLESS KHUL? AND THE OBLIGATION OF POST-CONSUMMATION MUT?A: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ACROSS THE FOUR SUNNI SCHOOLS OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE.
Abdul Jalil Shahidzai & Habibur Rahman Habibi
Faculty of Sharia, Department of Fiqh and Law, Sheikh Zayed University, Khost, Afghanistan
Email: [email protected]
Faculty of Sharia, Department of Fiqh and Law, Sheikh Zayed University, Khost, Afghanistan Email: [email protected]
Corresponding Author: [email protected]
