Legal Responsibility of Investigators of the Women and Children Protection Unit of Merauke Police Resort in the Investigation Process of Criminal Acts of Violence Against Children

legal responsibility investigator Women and Children Protection Unit violence against children Merauke Police Resort

Authors

November 11, 2026

Downloads

This study aims to analyze the forms of legal responsibility borne by investigators of the Women and Children Protection Unit of the Merauke Police Resort in investigating criminal acts of violence against children, as well as the obstacles they encounter and the measures taken to overcome them. This study employs a normative-empirical legal research approach. Data were collected through a review of the unit's case records from 2023 through July 2026, personnel records, interviews with informants, observations, and a literature review. The data were analyzed qualitatively using a prescriptive approach. The first research question was examined using the theory of legal responsibility, while the second was examined using the theory of legal protection. The findings reveal, first, that investigators' legal responsibilities have not been fully fulfilled. Although 95 case files were declared complete (P-21), numerous cases remained unresolved for extended periods. Only 20.41% of physical violence cases were resolved, and seven cases involving sexual intercourse with a child were recorded as having been settled through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or restorative justice (RJ), an approach that is legally permissible only under specific circumstances, including those involving offenders under 12 years of age. Most of these shortcomings cannot be attributed solely to assistant investigators but also fall within the responsibilities of officials authorized to appoint, train, and supervise investigators. Furthermore, the effectiveness of internal oversight mechanisms and associated sanctions has not been demonstrated. Second, the most significant obstacles concern law enforcement personnel, as all 11 personnel are assistant investigators who have not received specialized juvenile justice training, followed by legal and infrastructural constraints. These obstacles undermine both preventive and repressive legal protection for child victims.